Sherlock
Holmes and Dr. Watson hold an honored place among the ranks of famous male duos
such as Laurel and Hardy, Cheech and Chong, and Han Solo and Chewbacca. Indeed,
today it’s hard to believe that, in the early drafts of Doyle’s stories,
Holmes’s sidekick was named Ormand Sacker. I suspect Sir Arthur must have
realized that, since Watson represented “everyman,” he required a more
down-to-earth name – John Watson. And with that, it is interesting to note that
Watson’s first name is used only three times within the 60 Holmes stories.
All,
but four, of the Sherlock Holmes tales are narrated by Watson. But, the
character Watson not only serves as a chronicler, but also as a story telling
device. Watson often makes his own observations and offers his own theories, which
throw the reader off track a bit, and thus make Holmes’s deductions and
solutions all the more surprising.
If
you have enjoyed any of the many Sherlock Holmes movies and television programs,
you may have noticed that writers and actors interpret the character of John
Watson in wide-ranging ways. In some adaptations, Watson is a bumbling fool, in
others he is a wise and invaluable ally. So, two of the most important
decisions I had to make, as I was writing a new collection of Holmes pastiches,
were:
“What
kind of man was Dr. John Watson?
And,
“What was the nature of Sherlock’s and John’s relationship?
To
some extent, I drew upon my own experience, as an older man, with long-time
male friends. What kind of relationship do I
have with some of my better male friends?
You
will be able to see how I answered that question if you read my new collection
of Holmes adventures – Sherlock Holmes –
The Golden Years. Indeed, in one of
the stories in this collection, The Kongo Nkisi Spirit Train, a
character chats with Dr. Watson about what he sees as the role Watson plays in
Holmes’s life and work.
The
five new tales in this collection take place when Holmes and Watson are “retired”
– 1912 to 1913. So, I felt it was important to show how their relationship had
evolved, mellowed, and become deeper and richer in the decade following their supposed
retirement in 1903.
I
feel my treatment of Holmes’s and Watson’s relationship does not “violate” The
Canon, but rather builds upon it in a believable, logical manner -- given their
longevity of Holmes and Watson as colleagues. I would be curious to know what you think.
The
book Sherlock Holmes – The Golden Years
is AVAILABLE ON AMAZON and most on-line and main-street bookstores.